Free trial Sign-up

Please leave your name and email and we'll be in contact shortly.



Contact Number


Please complete the sum:        
3 + 3 =

How important is price to clients?

27th April 2015

Recent developments are pushing the legal sector towards the two Cs – Consolidation and Commoditisation.

Many law firms are understandably worried that pressure is being applied to their top line income as commoditisation drives down the prices being charged in the marketplace. 

However, it is not the commoditisation itself that is driving the price down, commoditisation is a result of the market pressures of supply and demand, and it is those factors that impact on the price which suppliers are able to charge.

There is a move in the general economy towards demand from the public for remote service, online service and non-business hours’ service.  As suppliers are able to meet this demand, particularly if they do so in bulk, they find that their unit costs fall since the delivery methods are more cost effective.  They can, therefore, pass these savings to their customers with the aim of competing for a larger share of the developing market.

As customers become more used to these lower prices, they use those prices as a benchmark for the amount that they expect to pay to all suppliers delivering what they see as the same service, something that the online price comparison sites have encouraged.

Looking towards the legal sector in particular, there are some firms that have changed their delivery methods to match the changing demand from clients.  These firms have found that they have been able to reduce their charges and move towards fixed fees.  That has, in turn, put pressure on other firms to do the same.

Price is always going to be an important factor to clients, particularly if they see competing firms offering the same service, or product.  However, it is not the most important issue to all clients.  At the end of the day, all clients will be looking for the lowest price – but the lowest price for the service that they require.  It may well be that they are prepared to pay a higher price when they know that they will receive that required service.  An example of this would be with repeat clients, where it is often the case that even if they could receive the same level of service elsewhere, they aren’t sure that that is the case.  On the other hand, for other clients, if in their minds they only require a standard service that they could obtain from any supplier, then they would expect to pay a lower price.

Most firms are now looking at ways to protect their income whether that is via:

  • Differentiation
  • Targeting different sections of the market
  • Creating demand for new sections of the market
  • Niche focus on services where higher fees can be justified

However, it could be argued that firms shouldn’t be asking whether price is important to clients, perhaps they should be asking whether they are operating with the appropriate profit margins for the market-driven prices, although I accept that certain scale is required to cover fixed costs.

If demand in the marketplace is changing, then suppliers should evolve to meet that demand or they will ultimately perish, unless they can educate the market of the benefits of their service.

This is why the market is being pushed towards the second C – Consolidation – with the aim of generating synergies and economies of scale in order to deliver services more cost effectively.

Protecting profit margins would also mean re-assessing the way in which services are delivered to clients and focusing on what the clients really want and value.  In many cases, that could be delivered at a lower cost to the practice and therefore protect profit margins despite falling income levels.

After all, it has often been said that Turnover is Vanity, but Profit is Sanity.


The Armstrong Watson legal sector team is working with law firms throughout the country on their strategic positioning and how they can respond to the challenges and take advantage of the opportunities that face them.  Please contact your local office to arrange to further discuss how we can help you, or contact Andy Poole on 07828 857830 or andy.poole@armstrongwatson.co.uk

Andy Poole is the Legal Sector Partner at Armstrong Watson, specialising exclusively in advising law firms.  Author of the Law Society toolkit on Financial Stability in Law Firms, Andy heads the legal sector team at Armstrong Watson, which has 15 offices and over 400 people.  The legal sector team advises law firms throughout the UK on strategic, structural and other business improvement issues as well as providing efficient accounting, tax and SRA accounts rules services. 

The Law Society has endorsed Armstrong Watson for the provision of accountancy services to law firms throughout the whole of the North of England.

Further information can be found at: www.armstrongwatson.co.uk/legalsector

The client and experts view...

  • thumb1
Latest newsspeech Bubble

System Maintenance

Please be aware that we are performing some system maintenance this weekend. We don’t anticipate that this will result in any downtime of our services, but we apologise if it does cause any inconvenience

Government Confirms New Regulations and Qualifications for Estate Agents Will Happen

The government has accepted the proposals of the Regulation of Property Agents (RoPA) with wide-spread consequences for estate and letting agents.

The proposals reach right into the heart of the industry to affect regulation, training and licensing.



Fears of Tougher Regulations and Unjust Costs Mount Ahead of Government Announcement

Estate Agents are waiting for the big reveal on Monday after Lord Best has admitted some firms could close when the regulation of property agents (ROPA) makes its recommendations to the Government early next week.

Lord Best, the chair of ROPA, has already outlined the working group’s desire for more regulation.


[NEWSFLASH] Agent Charged DOUBLE Over AML Registration Mistake

Property Industry Eye (PIE) has highlighted the case of an estate agent who has fallen foul of HMRC and been charged double.

On 4th April, with plenty of time to spare, Hayman-Joyce renewed their annual HMRC registration. They paid the fee and thought they’d ticked all the boxes.


Compliance in a Box: The Natural Remedy for Your AML Headache

Estate agents around the country are realising that the new 5th AML Directive goes deep. There’s a lot of work involved in becoming compliant. And the penalties for non-compliance, either deliberately or through confusion, are severe. (more…)

newsletter sign-up

Sign up for our e-newsletter

Email Address

trial sign-up

Click the Apply button opposite to use our software on a trial basis...

  • etsosnews

  • etsosnews

  • Linkedin Twitter Facebook
    This site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies.