Free trial Sign-up

Please leave your name and email and we'll be in contact shortly.



Contact Number


Please complete the sum:        
46 + 1 =

Does Your Business Convey the Right Message for Sanctions, PEPs & SIPs?

31st July 2013

As Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements and the consequences of those failing to comply become yet more prevalent it’s increasingly clear that the legal sector is sitting up and taking notice. However, when the subject of PEPS (Politically Exposed Persons), Sanctions and SIPs is raised there are still some who are willing to consider such risks as fictional entities, never likely to darken their door. So, can you guarantee that PEPs are not instructing fee earners and putting you and your business at risk?

Dealing with any person or business named on a Sanctions List means a fine or imprisonment for the person responsible for company’s compliance – normally the MLRO.  It is advisable to check all new clients (businesses and individuals) against official Sanctions and PEP lists.

All fee earners should be aware of the measures needed to identify they are dealing with a PEP and what they are legally required to do. Firms are required to have in place a risk based process for such threats and once discovered they should:

  • seek senior management approval for the business relationship
  • take adequate measures to establish source of funds and source of wealth
  • conduct closer on-going monitoring of the business relationship.

E-verification providers such as SmartSearch can deliver further information about such individuals and all client records are subject to daily monitoring against updates to the Sanctions and PEP lists The final AML certificate clearly shows whether an individual appears on such a list.

Firms who turn a blind eye to the activities of corrupt PEPs and try to simply ‘manage’ the relationship face a risk of serious sanction.


The client and experts view...

  • thumb1
Latest newsspeech Bubble

Case Study: Noise issue could cost agent £9000

Our latest case study come from a recent news item to have hit the industry and national press.

A disgruntled tenant is claiming £9,000 in damages from an agent and landlord who, in his litigation, he claims rented him a flat with an excessive noise issue. (more…)

Crack down on AML with “Flag it Up”

The government have moved to crack down on Money Laundering in the UK with a new campaign focusing on the accountancy, legal and property sectors. (more…)

How to write your AML risk assessment

The Money Laundering Regulations require estate agents to risk assess their business relationships and apply an appropriate level of investigation to ensure that they understand who their customer is, and why they are involved in the transaction. (more…)

Fines for failure to identify beneficial owners

Agents are falling foul of money laundering regulations by not having a process in place to identify third party ownership and beneficial owners. (more…)

NEWSFLASH: Funding doubles for industry regulator

The government have announced a significant funding increase for property industry regulator the National Trading Standards Estate Agency Team (NTSEAT).

There has long been criticism of a lack of resource in the team whose responsibility it is to police and enforce various regulations estate agents are governed by; including the Estate Agents Act 1979 and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPRs). (more…)

newsletter sign-up

Sign up for our e-newsletter

Email Address

trial sign-up

Click the Apply button opposite to use our software on a trial basis...

  • etsosnews

  • etsosnews

  • Linkedin Twitter Facebook
    This site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies.