X
etsos

Free trial Sign-up

Please leave your name and email and we'll be in contact shortly.

Name

Company

Contact Number

Email

Please complete the sum:        
40 + 1 =

Case Study: Did estate agent earn their “performance fee?”

25th June 2018

In one of the first cases to cite the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPRs), The Property Ombudsman (TPO) has upheld a complaint made against an agent who had charged a performance fee on top of their standard fees.

A vendor chose to market their property with an agent who offered a pay monthly service with “no hidden charges, no commission, no minimum term.” The property received an offer for over 10% more than the asking price, triggering a “performance fee” in favour of the agent, a fee that the vendor claimed they had not been made aware of.

Despite the fact that the fee appeared in the terms of business, it was not “clearly and unambiguously” displayed. It did not, for example, feature in “fees and charges”, instead featuring in the penultimate section of the document. Nor did the fee appear anywhere on website where the misleading statement “no hidden charges, no commission, no minimum term” featured prominently.

In the view of The Property Ombudsman this was a clear breach of TPO’s Codes of Practice in failing to comply with the CPRs. TPO went on to highlight the emphasis CPRs place on agents when it comes to

  • hidden or unexpected fees which are considered a misleading omission under CPRs, and
  • the average consumer who would not necessarily be expected to read in detail the full contents of the terms and conditions.

The second point is important in a business to consumer context. Although a “common sense” outcome simply putting something in our terms and conditions without drawing attention to its importance will not be tolerated.

Agents should be mindful to ensure that all potential costs incurred are known to the client. This includes both sales and lettings, which has been the focus of recent scrutiny when it comes to tenant fees and charges.

 

Make sure you are asking the right questions of your clients, and documenting their response. Compliance Packs from Landmark are a simple pay-as-you-go compliance tool to help agents fulfil their obligations under CPRs and AML.

Compliance in a Box includes an electronic property information questionnaire alongside client verification checks and retains a time and date stamped audit trail of all compliance activity.

For more information please complete the form below, or contact Compliance in a Box on 01524 220013

Register your interest today

 

Verification

The client and experts view...

  • thumb1
Latest newsspeech Bubble

1/2 Day AML/CPR Courses for Estate Agents

Helping you stay the right side of regulation

Landmark and Michael Stephen Day of Integra Property Services host a 1/2 day training course on 27th & 28th March in Manchester and Milton Keynes. Landmark are offering an 18% discount on the standard course fee. CLICK HERE to book your ticket(s). (more…)

Blog 3: Implementing your risk assessment

The Money Laundering Regulations require estate agents to risk assess their business relationships and apply an appropriate level of investigation to ensure that they understand who their customer is, and why they are involved in the transaction. (more…)

Blog 2: What are HMRC Looking for?

The Money Laundering Regulations require estate agents to risk assess their business relationships and apply an appropriate level of investigation to ensure that they understand who their customer is, and why they are involved in the transaction. (more…)

Blog 1: What is the risk?

The Money Laundering Regulations require estate agents to risk assess their business relationships and apply an appropriate level of investigation to ensure that they understand who their customer is, and why they are involved in the transaction. (more…)

Case Study: Noise issue could cost agent £9000

Our latest case study come from a recent news item to have hit the industry and national press.

A disgruntled tenant is claiming £9,000 in damages from an agent and landlord who, in his litigation, he claims rented him a flat with an excessive noise issue. (more…)

divider
newsletter sign-up

Sign up for our e-newsletter

Name
Company
Email Address
trialTop

trial sign-up

Click the Apply button opposite to use our software on a trial basis...

trialBottom
  • etsosnews

  • etsosnews

  • Linkedin Twitter Facebook
    This site uses cookies. Find out more about this site’s cookies.